Key Issue: What does science indicate about individual tax rate ?
Key Issue: What does science indicate about individual tax rate when it comes to encouraging full employment and low interest rates with proper incentives for technological investment?
Research indicates that moderate individual tax rates are most conducive to economic growth, full employment, and technological investment. Studies suggest top marginal rates between 35-45% optimize the balance between revenue generation and growth incentives. The elasticity of taxable income for high earners, estimated at 0.4, implies that excessive rates can significantly reduce reported income and overall economic activity. Lower capital gains rates, typically 15-20%, are shown to stimulate investment and innovation. This tax structure, combined with targeted R&D incentives, can foster a dynamic economy without overly burdening productive activities.
A simplified, broader-based tax system enhances these effects. Research consistently shows that reducing complexity and eliminating distortionary deductions improves economic efficiency. Countries with streamlined tax codes often experience higher rates of business formation and technological advancement. Moreover, a clear and stable tax environment reduces uncertainty, encouraging long-term investment decisions. Studies indicate that policy stability is nearly as important as the rates themselves in promoting sustained economic growth and innovation.
The interplay between individual tax rates and monetary policy is critical. Moderate tax rates contribute to full employment by incentivizing work and entrepreneurship, while also supporting low inflation by avoiding excessive demand stimulation. This environment allows central banks to maintain lower interest rates, further encouraging investment. Research from the OECD suggests that countries with well-designed tax systems can achieve a virtuous cycle of growth, employment, and innovation, creating a favorable climate for technological advancement and economic stability.
Bottom line
Science indicates that a growth-oriented individual tax system should feature top marginal rates of 35-45%, lower capital gains rates of 15-20%, and a simplified, broader tax base. This structure, coupled with targeted innovation incentives and policy stability, optimizes conditions for full employment, low interest rates, and technological investment. While redistributive goals are important, policymakers must carefully balance these with growth incentives to create an environment conducive to sustained economic prosperity and innovation.
Sources:
Romer, C. D., & Romer, D. H. (2010). The macroeconomic effects of tax changes: Estimates based on a new measure of fiscal shocks. American Economic Review, 100(3), 763-801.
Saez, E., Slemrod, J., & Giertz, S. H. (2012). The elasticity of taxable income with respect to marginal tax rates: A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature, 50(1), 3-50.
Akcigit, U., Grigsby, J., Nicholas, T., & Stantcheva, S. (2022). Taxation and innovation in the twentieth century. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 137(1), 329-385.
Johansson, Å., et al. (2008). Taxation and Economic Growth. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 620, OECD Publishing, Paris.
Gale, W. G., & Samwick, A. A. (2017). Effects of Income Tax Changes on Economic Growth. In A. J. Auerbach & K. Smetters (Eds.), The Economics of Tax Policy (pp. 13-39). Oxford University Press.
Djankov, S., Ganser, T., McLiesh, C., Ramalho, R., & Shleifer, A. (2010). The effect of corporate taxes on investment and entrepreneurship. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2(3), 31-64.
Hansson, Å. (2020). Tax policy and entrepreneurship: a survey of the empirical evidence. International Review of Entrepreneurship, 18(3), 293-324.
Barro, R. J., & Redlick, C. J. (2011). Macroeconomic effects from government purchases and taxes. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(1), 51-102.